Skip to content

Cognitive Dissonance Definition: When Somebody Says One Thing, Does Another, Thinks Something Else

By Remy Meraz June 23, 2024

Cognitive Dissonance Definition: When Somebody Says One Thing, Does Another, Thinks Something Else

Introduction: Understanding Cognitive Dissonance

Defining Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive dissonance, a term first introduced by psychologist Leon Festinger in the 1950s, refers to the mental discomfort experienced by a person who holds contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values at the same time or is confronted by new information that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values. This fundamental psychological theory has become a cornerstone in social psychology, providing a framework for understanding how and why people change their attitudes or behaviors to reduce the discomfort caused by inconsistency.

The Relevance of Cognitive Dissonance in Everyday Life

Every day, human beings navigate a world rife with contradictions and conflicts between what they believe and what they do. From the voter who supports environmental policies yet drives a gas-guzzling vehicle, to the consumer who values health but can't resist junk food, cognitive dissonance is a pervasive force shaping behaviors and attitudes. It touches on everything from personal relationships to consumer behavior, decision-making, and beyond.

In our lives, reducing cognitive dissonance often involves changing our attitudes, beliefs, or actions to make them more consistent with each other. This adjustment can manifest in various ways: justifying our behavior, changing our beliefs, or simply avoiding contradictory information. Understanding this psychological process not only helps us manage our own lives better but also enables us to understand those around us more deeply, particularly in how they deal with conflicts between their stated beliefs and actual behavior.

Moreover, in the professional world, recognizing the signs of cognitive dissonance can improve negotiation strategies, management techniques, and marketing approaches. By understanding that human beings are not always rational actors and often seek psychological consistency, professionals can tailor their approaches to better match the real drivers of human behavior.

Cognitive dissonance is not merely an academic concept studied in laboratory experiments; it is a real, vibrant part of the psychological makeup that affects decision-making and personal growth. By exploring its mechanisms and implications, we can unlock more effective ways to influence behavior, foster healthier relationships, and build better organizational cultures. Understanding cognitive dissonance is understanding the human condition in its most conflicting, challenging, and ultimately fascinating form.

Join our Newsletter

Transform your career with our personal growth insights. Get one valuable tip right in your inbox every Saturday morning.

Part I: The Basics of Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive Dissonance Definition

Cognitive dissonance is defined as the psychological discomfort experienced when one simultaneously holds two or more conflicting cognitions: ideas, beliefs, values, or emotional reactions. In a state of dissonance, people may feel surprise, dread, guilt, anger, or embarrassment. Cognitive dissonance is a significant and pervasive phenomenon and plays a key role in many value judgments, decisions, and evaluations. Becoming aware of how conflicting beliefs impact the decision-making process is a powerful tool for understanding human behavior at its core.

What is Cognitive Dissonance?

Cognitive dissonance isn't just a momentary state of confusion or uncertainty; it's a fundamental psychological driving force that compels individuals to act, think, and sometimes even rationalize their behaviors in ways that might otherwise seem illogical or contradictory. At its heart, cognitive dissonance theory is based on the notion that individuals strive for internal consistency. When confronted with inconsistencies between attitudes or behaviors, people engage in dissonance reduction strategies, which are efforts to minimize the discomfort of dissonance.

This psychological phenomenon is frequently observed in everyday situations—for instance, when people smoke despite knowing it's bad for their health, or when they justify spending money on unnecessary items by convincing themselves these purchases were necessary. This theory is extensively applied in marketing, behavioral economics, and health psychology, to understand why people act against their best interests, how they justify those actions, and how they maintain their self-image in the face of contradictory actions or beliefs.

Social psychology research emphasizes that cognitive dissonance involves a mixture of emotions—like regret, embarrassment, and anxiety—that people experience when they participate in an action that goes against their pre-existing self-concepts or when they are presented with evidence that contradicts their beliefs. It's these feelings that often lead to shifting blame, changing conflicting beliefs, or even altering one's behavior to reduce the dissonance.

Understanding cognitive dissonance and its resolution strategies not only illuminates why certain decision-making anomalies occur—such as why individuals persist in self-destructive habits or deny beneficial information—but also provides a framework for influencing behavior. By creating situations where dissonance is likely, such as through counterattitudinal advocacy, role-playing, or the presentation of irrefutable evidence, one can encourage people to reevaluate their cognitions and make more healthful or rational choices.

Cognitive dissonance is a dynamic and influential theory in social psychology, offering profound insights into the complex interplay between beliefs, behavior, and the human psyche. As we continue to study and understand this concept, it becomes a crucial tool in the realms of psychology, marketing, and beyond, providing a strategic approach to fostering healthier decisions and attitudes among individuals and groups.

Cognitive Dissonance Definition: When Somebody Says One Thing, Does Another, Thinks Something Else

Part II: Cognitive Dissonance in Theory

Theoretical Model

Cognitive dissonance theory was first developed by Leon Festinger in 1957. It suggests that we have an inner drive to hold all our attitudes and beliefs in harmony and avoid disharmony (or dissonance). This model is based on the belief that individuals seek consistency among their cognitions (i.e., beliefs, opinions). When there is an inconsistency between attitudes or behaviors (dissonance), something must change to eliminate the dissonance. In the case of a discrepancy between attitudes and behavior, it is most likely that the attitude will change to accommodate the behavior.

Two factors affect the strength of the dissonance: the number of dissonant beliefs, and the importance attached to each belief. The pressure to reduce cognitive dissonance is felt more strongly when the dissonant beliefs are about oneself and less strongly when they are about others, or when they are insignificant compared to the magnitude of the dissonant belief.

Balance Theory

Developed by Fritz Heider, Balance Theory is a triangle theory of attitudes that involves the person (P), another person (O), and an impersonal object or idea (X). In this model, balance exists when all three fit together harmoniously. If there is an imbalance among these three, the individual experiences psychological tension and is motivated to reduce this imbalance. Balance theory is linked closely with cognitive dissonance theory as both suggest that conflicting beliefs and attitudes can result in discomfort leading to an alteration in one's beliefs or attitudes to reduce the conflict.

For example, if a person (P) likes an object (X) but has a friend (O) who dislikes the same object, the individual experiences imbalance. To reduce this imbalance, the person might change their attitude toward the object, influence the friend to change their attitude, or possibly even end the friendship to restore balance.

Self-perception Theory

Daryl Bem's Self-perception Theory suggests that people develop attitudes by observing their own behavior and concluding what attitudes must have caused it. This is especially true when internal cues are weak or uninterpretable. The theory extends on cognitive dissonance, proposing that people change their attitudes without the presence of psychological stress from inconsistencies. For instance, if someone who regularly recycles is asked why they do it, they might conclude that they care about the environment because they recycle, rather than recycling because they believe they should care about the environment.

Self-perception is thus a subtle form of cognitive dissonance, as it involves making sense of one's actions in the absence of a clear internal motivation. Where cognitive dissonance assumes that people feel uncomfortable because of conflicting beliefs, self-perception suggests that individuals are merely making sense of their actions in the most straightforward way possible.

Understanding these theories provides a deeper insight into how and why people seek to maintain an internal consistency and how they adapt their beliefs to new information or changing circumstances, which is a fundamental aspect of social behavior and personal growth. Each theory contributes uniquely to our understanding of the psychological processes at play when people encounter conflicting information or behaviors, influencing everything from personal relationships to broader social interactions.

Part III: Manifestations of Cognitive Dissonance

Word-Deed Misalignment

One of the most palpable manifestations of cognitive dissonance is the misalignment between what people say and what they do, often referred to as "word-deed misalignment." This phenomenon is visible when individuals' actions contradict their expressed beliefs or values, leading to a state of psychological tension. For example, someone might advocate for environmental conservation yet frequently travel by air, which has a high carbon footprint. Such contradictions are not just personal; they are also observed in corporate and political contexts, where the gap between public commitments and actual practices can lead to public outrage and accusations of hypocrisy.

When Do People Perceive Words and Deeds as Misaligned?

The perception of misalignment between words and actions depends significantly on the observer's values, expectations, and the context in which the behavior occurs. Psychological research suggests that people are more likely to notice and be affected by misalignment when it involves a moral or ethical dimension—where the stakes of hypocrisy are high. Moreover, the clarity of the commitment and the voluntary nature of the behavior influence how harshly the individual is judged. For instance, if a politician vocally opposes drug use but is then discovered using drugs, the contradiction between their words and actions is stark and leads to severe criticism.

Social norms and cultural expectations also play a crucial role. In societies where honesty and consistency are highly valued, discrepancies between what one says and does are more likely to be scrutinized and criticized. Additionally, the closer the relationship between the observer and the actor, the more intense the scrutiny and the stronger the dissonance felt by the observer.

Predictive Dissonance Model

The Predictive Dissonance Model builds on the foundational concepts of cognitive dissonance to explain how expectations and predictions about future behavior influence one's reactions to dissonance. According to this model, dissonance occurs not only when actions contradict beliefs but also when there is a deviation from expected future behavior. This aspect of the model helps explain why people often feel uneasy about changing plans or failing to meet their own stated goals.

For example, if an individual commits to a diet and tells friends about it, the expectation that others now have of them to follow through creates a psychological commitment. If the individual then eats in a way that contradicts this commitment, the dissonance is not just internal (between their beliefs and actions) but also external, as it conflicts with others' expectations.

This model extends our understanding of cognitive dissonance by incorporating the dimension of anticipated future behavior, thus broadening the scope of situations and behaviors that can generate dissonance. It emphasizes the dynamic nature of our psychological processes and how they are influenced not just by what we do, but by what we intend to do, and what others expect us to do. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for addressing cognitive dissonance in personal decisions, social interactions, and even in organizational settings where expectations and commitments play critical roles.

Cognitive Dissonance Definition: When Somebody Says One Thing, Does Another, Thinks Something Else

Part IV: Cognitive Dissonance in Decision Making

Free Choice

The concept of free choice plays a pivotal role in the dynamics of cognitive dissonance, particularly in decision-making processes. When individuals make choices freely without external coercion, they often experience greater dissonance, especially if the alternatives are attractive. This phenomenon is rooted in the need to justify one's decisions. For instance, after purchasing a costly item, a buyer might focus on its positive aspects while overlooking the negatives to justify the decision and reduce dissonance. The principle here is that making a choice freely increases personal responsibility for the outcome of the choice, thereby magnifying the psychological need to believe that the right decision was made.

Criticism of the Free-Choice Paradigm

Although widely influential, the free-choice paradigm has faced criticism for its simplicity and the difficulty in isolating variables in experimental settings. Critics argue that this model may not fully account for the complexities of human decision-making, where choices are rarely made in a vacuum. Environmental, social, and historical contexts significantly influence decisions, which the free-choice paradigm often overlooks. Furthermore, recent research suggests that the dissonance experienced in free-choice scenarios might also relate to factors like anticipated regret or fear of being wrong, rather than solely the need to maintain internal consistency.

Action–Motivation Model

Building on the foundation of traditional cognitive dissonance theory, the Action–Motivation Model proposes that dissonance is fundamentally driven by an individual's underlying motivations influencing their actions. This model suggests that dissonance occurs when there is a misalignment between one’s actions and motivations, particularly when actions contradict deeply held values or goals. For example, if a person who values health smokes, the action (smoking) is at odds with the motivation (being healthy).

This model shifts the focus from justifying decisions after they are made to understanding the motivational underpinnings that lead to those decisions. It provides a more nuanced understanding of how dissonance can be reduced not just by changing cognitions to suit actions but also by aligning actions more closely with core motivations and values. Understanding this alignment is crucial for effective decision-making, as it helps individuals and organizations make choices that are not only rational but also resonate with their broader goals and values.

In essence, cognitive dissonance in decision-making illustrates the complex interplay between free choice, individual responsibility, and the innate drive for consistency between our beliefs, actions, and motivations. By studying how these elements interact, we can gain deeper insights into human psychology and improve our approaches to decision-making, both personally and professionally.

Part V: Cognitive Dissonance and Hypocrisy

When Do People Interpret Misalignment as Hypocrisy?

Hypocrisy judgments occur when there is a perceived discrepancy between what someone says and what they do, especially when their actions contravene the public and personal standards they advocate. This perception of hypocrisy is particularly potent when the individual holds a position of authority or moral standing, where their words are expected to align closely with their actions. The judgment of hypocrisy intensifies under the public eye, as society often holds individuals accountable to the social norms and ethical standards they espouse.

People are more likely to label such discrepancies as hypocrisy when the actions have significant ethical or moral implications. For example, a politician campaigning on anti-corruption but engaging in corrupt practices or a celebrity promoting environmental responsibility while leading a conspicuously wasteful lifestyle. These instances provoke strong reactions because they not only represent a clear misalignment between word and deed but also undermine trust and credibility, which are crucial in relationships and societal structures.

Magnitude of Dissonance

The magnitude of cognitive dissonance experienced by an individual can vary greatly depending on several factors, including the importance of the beliefs, the degree of inconsistency between beliefs and actions, and the individual’s ability to rationalize or justify the discrepancy. The greater the significance of the beliefs and the more the actions deviate from these beliefs, the greater the dissonance.

This magnitude of dissonance can lead to various negative consequences if not resolved. Individuals may experience stress, anxiety, or even public humiliation, which can compel them to either modify their beliefs or alter their behaviors to reduce dissonance. The intensity of these feelings often prompts more substantial changes or more fervent justifications to align their external actions with their internal beliefs.

In contexts where social norms are highly valued, the dissonance can be particularly severe. This is often observed in cultures where honor and reputation are paramount. Here, the failure to live up to communal standards can result in not just personal discomfort but also social ostracism. Consequently, the motivation to align one's behavior with one's stated beliefs is not merely a personal preference but a social imperative.

Understanding the dynamics of hypocrisy and the magnitude of dissonance provides insight into how cognitive dissonance functions not only as a personal psychological phenomenon but also as a social mechanism that enforces normative behavior. This understanding helps elucidate why individuals and institutions sometimes go to great lengths to appear consistent, even when it involves significant personal or ethical compromise.

Join our Newsletter

Transform your career with our personal growth insights. Get one valuable tip right in your inbox every Saturday morning.

Part VI: Cognitive Dissonance in Social Contexts

Negative Interpersonal Consequences

Cognitive dissonance frequently manifests in social interactions and can have profound negative interpersonal consequences. When individuals act in ways that contradict their expressed values or the expectations set by their social groups, it can lead to strain in relationships. For example, if someone consistently fails to meet commitments to friends or family under the guise of conflicting schedules, the repeated discrepancies between their words and actions can foster feelings of distrust and resentment among those affected.

The tension resulting from cognitive dissonance can also escalate into more serious social repercussions, such as conflict, alienation, and even the dissolution of relationships. In workplace settings, this might manifest as decreased cooperation and teamwork when team members perceive a lack of integrity or consistency in their leaders or colleagues. Such environments can lead to a toxic culture where mistrust and disengagement are rampant, severely impacting organizational health and productivity.

Forbidden Behavior Paradigm

The Forbidden Behavior Paradigm is a concept within the study of cognitive dissonance that deals with the psychological and social consequences of engaging in behaviors that are deemed unacceptable or prohibited by societal standards. According to this paradigm, when individuals engage in forbidden behaviors, they experience heightened levels of dissonance because these actions clash with internalized social norms and personal moral codes.

For instance, consider a scenario where a person participates in illegal downloading of music or movies. Even if the individual rationalizes the behavior by thinking that "everyone does it" or "companies charge too much," they might still experience dissonance if their actions conflict with their self-image as an honest person or with societal laws. This dissonance can lead to feelings of guilt, which they may attempt to alleviate by changing their beliefs about the morality of their actions, justifying their behavior more aggressively, or ceasing the behavior altogether.

The Forbidden Behavior Paradigm illuminates how cognitive dissonance functions as a regulatory mechanism in maintaining social order. By inducing discomfort when individuals act against normative expectations, dissonance encourages behaviors that are more in line with societal values and laws. This is crucial in understanding both the adaptability and the enforcement of social norms, as it highlights the psychological underpinnings of why people generally strive to act in accordance with shared ethical standards.

In sum, cognitive dissonance in social contexts not only affects personal relationships and individual well-being but also plays a significant role in shaping societal behavior and cultural conformity. Recognizing these dynamics allows for better management of personal interactions and enhances our understanding of social cohesion and the maintenance of societal norms.

Cognitive Dissonance Definition: When Somebody Says One Thing, Does Another, Thinks Something Else

Part VII: Psychological Impacts

The Psychology of Mental Stress

Cognitive dissonance not only influences behaviors and decisions but also has significant psychological impacts, particularly in the realm of mental stress. This psychological process can lead to heightened stress when individuals struggle to reconcile conflicting beliefs or when they act in ways that contradict their values. Such stress is not merely an emotional discomfort but can manifest in various mental health symptoms, including anxiety, guilt, and even depressive feelings.

Understanding Stress from Cognitive Dissonance

The stress arising from cognitive dissonance occurs because the brain strives for consistency. When confronted with conflicting information or behaviors, the mental effort required to resolve the inconsistency can be substantial. This effort can lead to mental exhaustion and stress, particularly if the dissonance is prolonged or if the conflicting elements are central to the individual's identity or core values. For example, a person who prides themselves on being truthful may experience significant stress when they find themselves compelled to lie to maintain social harmony.

Cognitive Dissonance and Mental Health

The effects of cognitive dissonance on mental health are profound. Prolonged dissonance can lead to chronic stress, affecting overall psychological well-being. Individuals may experience mood swings, irritability, or lethargy as they internally debate their beliefs versus their actions. Over time, this can lead to more serious mental health issues, such as anxiety disorders or depression, especially if the individual feels trapped in a cycle of dissonance without a clear resolution.

Coping Mechanisms and Psychological Adaptation

To cope with the stress and discomfort caused by cognitive dissonance, individuals often employ various psychological strategies. These can include changing their beliefs to align more closely with their actions, rationalizing their behaviors, or avoiding situations that might increase dissonance. For instance, someone who feels guilty about not exercising might start to undervalue the benefits of exercise as a way to reduce their discomfort.

Moreover, some individuals might seek external validation to justify their actions and alleviate the stress caused by dissonance. Engaging in dialogue with others who share similar dissonant behaviors or beliefs can reinforce one's own stance and reduce the feeling of isolation and stress.

The Role of Awareness and Intervention

Being aware of how cognitive dissonance affects mental health is crucial for both individuals and mental health professionals. Recognizing the signs of dissonance-related stress can lead to earlier interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral techniques that help individuals align their actions with their values or find healthier ways to resolve conflicts between their beliefs and behaviors. Such interventions are not only crucial for individual mental health but can also improve social relationships and professional productivity by reducing the underlying tension and promoting a more coherent sense of self.

In summary, the psychological impact of cognitive dissonance extends far beyond momentary discomfort. It can induce significant mental stress that impacts daily functioning and long-term mental health. Understanding and addressing the root causes of this stress through self-awareness, therapeutic interventions, and social support are essential for maintaining psychological well-being in the face of conflicting pressures and expectations.

Part VIII: Cognitive Dissonance in Consumer Behavior

Consumer Behavior

Cognitive dissonance frequently manifests in the realm of consumer behavior, influencing how decisions are made and how post-purchase reactions are handled. This psychological phenomenon can significantly impact shopping habits, brand loyalty, and overall consumer satisfaction.

Decision Making in Purchasing

The decision-making process in purchasing is a prime scenario for the emergence of cognitive dissonance. Consumers often face conflicts between different desires, needs, budget constraints, and product options. For instance, when choosing between a more expensive, high-quality product and a cheaper, less durable alternative, the consumer may experience dissonance after making a choice, questioning whether they made the right decision. This second-guessing can lead to buyer's remorse or post-purchase rationalization where the consumer justifies their choice based on various factors like cost savings or perceived value.

Impact of Cognitive Dissonance on Consumer Satisfaction

Post-purchase dissonance is particularly common in markets with many similar and competitive options or where the purchases are expensive and infrequent, like cars or electronics. Consumers might feel dissatisfied with their choices if they encounter information that contradicts their purchase decision. To reduce dissonance, they may avoid negative reviews of the chosen product or seek out positive information that confirms the wisdom of their choice. This behavior demonstrates how cognitive dissonance can drive consumers to selectively filter information to align with their actions and self-perception.

Strategies to Reduce Cognitive Dissonance in Marketing

Marketers can design strategies to minimize cognitive dissonance among consumers. One effective approach is providing reassurance through generous return policies, warranties, and positive customer testimonials. These strategies help reinforce the consumer's belief that they made a wise choice, thereby reducing the potential for dissonance.

Another tactic involves creating advertisements that focus not only on the features of a product but also on its alignment with consumer values, such as sustainability or innovation. By doing so, marketers can tap into the consumer's self-concept and values, reducing the likelihood of dissonance occurring after the purchase.

Consumer Behavior and Social Influence

Social psychology plays a crucial role in consumer behavior, especially regarding how social norms and peer influences can impact purchasing decisions. Consumers often look to their social networks for cues on what to buy, where to shop, and how to consume. When everyone in a social circle is buying a particular brand or product, the pressure to conform can trigger cognitive dissonance if a person chooses differently. Consequently, understanding the social dynamics at play can help marketers and businesses not only in crafting their strategies but also in predicting consumer trends and behaviors.

Real-World Examples and Applications

Real-world examples abound where cognitive dissonance influences consumer behavior. From the fashion industry, where buyers might grapple with the moral implications of fast fashion, to tech enthusiasts who must reconcile the desire for the latest gadget with budget constraints, cognitive dissonance is a pivotal factor in the consumer's journey. Acknowledging and addressing these internal conflicts can lead to more effective marketing strategies and more satisfied customers.

In summary, cognitive dissonance in consumer behavior is a critical factor that affects everything from individual purchasing decisions to broader market trends. By understanding and addressing the causes and consequences of this psychological phenomenon, businesses can better cater to their customers' needs and reduce the cognitive dissonance experienced by consumers, leading to greater satisfaction and loyalty.

Cognitive Dissonance Definition: When Somebody Says One Thing, Does Another, Thinks Something Else

Conclusion: Implications and Understanding of Cognitive Dissonance

Summarizing Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive dissonance, as explored throughout this discussion, is a powerful psychological phenomenon that influences human behavior across various aspects of life. From the basic understanding and definitions to complex models and real-world applications, cognitive dissonance reveals why and how people strive to maintain internal consistency in their beliefs and actions. This theory explains the discomfort that comes from conflicting beliefs, leading individuals to engage in mental gymnastics to justify or reconcile these discrepancies.

In everyday life, cognitive dissonance affects decisions ranging from minor choices about what to buy to significant moral dilemmas about right and wrong. It drives people to change their opinions, modify their behaviors, or even alter their perception of reality to reduce the discomfort of dissonance. This concept is crucial in understanding everything from consumer behavior to social interactions and personal relationships.

Cognitive Dissonance Means: A Recap

Cognitive dissonance means living with conflicting beliefs, actions, or feelings, leading to a state of mental discomfort that individuals are motivated to resolve. The resolution often requires adjustments in one’s thinking, beliefs, or actions. For instance, when faced with evidence that contradicts deeply held beliefs, a person might dismiss the new information, reinterpret their beliefs, or change their stance entirely.

This phenomenon has practical implications in various fields, including psychology, marketing, politics, and education. For example, marketers exploit cognitive dissonance by creating campaigns that align with consumers' self-image, thereby encouraging purchases that feel consistent with their identity. Similarly, educators and psychologists use dissonance theory to help individuals adopt healthier behaviors or adjust maladaptive thinking patterns.

Understanding cognitive dissonance not only provides insights into individual behaviors but also offers a lens through which we can view societal and cultural dynamics. It helps explain why people often resist change, why they might cling to outdated or disproven beliefs, and how they reconcile their self-image with their actions in a continuously evolving world.

In conclusion, cognitive dissonance is a fundamental aspect of human psychology that underscores the complexities of mental processes involved in maintaining a consistent self-image. It is a testament to the human capacity for adaptation and rationalization, highlighting how deeply ingrained the need for internal consistency is within the human psyche. By exploring and understanding cognitive dissonance, we gain a deeper appreciation for the nuanced ways in which individuals navigate the labyrinth of conflicting realities in their quest for psychological equilibrium.

Read more about: Self Advocacy, Professional Development, Conflict Resolution

About Remy Meraz

Remy Meraz, co-founder, and CEO of Zella Life, is a visionary leader who leveraged corporate glass ceiling challenges as a woman of color to drive systemic change.

While leading and cultivating high-performance teams from VC-backed startups to Fortune 500, she consistently faced obstacles such as inadequate mentorship, lack of psychological safety, and non-personalized training. Taking matters into her own hands, she turned to executive coaching and NLP training. This life-changing growth experience led to breaking leadership barriers and a passion for cognitive psychology.

Motivated by her experiences, she co-founded Zella Life, an innovative AI-driven coaching platform bridging the talent development gap by enhancing soft skills and emotional intelligence (EQ) in the workplace.

Her vision with Zella Life is to transform professional development into an inclusive and impactful journey, focused on the distinct needs of both individuals and organizations. She aims to promote advancement and culture change by ensuring every professional's growth is acknowledged and supported.

Today, Remy is recognized as an influential innovator, trainer, mentor, and business leader. Under her leadership, Zella Life has delivered significant measurable outcomes for numerous well-known brands. This track record of positive outcomes garnered attention and funding from Google for Startups and Pledge LA, establishing Zella Life as a pivotal force in the learning and development arena tackling and resolving fundamental talent development issues for organizations of all sizes.